Question 1

Is blockchain actually the right solution for our use case?

Accepted Answer

Often it is not, and we will say so. Blockchain earns its place when you need decentralised trust between parties who do not trust each other, a transaction history nobody can quietly rewrite, or token-based access control. For most internal business processes a conventional database is faster, cheaper, and easier to maintain. We start every engagement with that assessment before quoting anything.

Question 2

Which blockchains do you develop for?

Accepted Answer

Primarily EVM-compatible networks: Ethereum, Polygon, BNB Smart Chain, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, and other Layer 2 networks. We also set up private and permissioned chains for enterprise and consortium use. The recommendation depends on transaction cost, finality speed, ecosystem maturity, and the regulatory context of your market, not on which chain is trending.

Question 3

How much does smart contract development cost?

Accepted Answer

A focused smart contract project starts at [INSERIRE CIFRA]. That covers architecture, implementation, a full test suite, and audit-ready documentation. A complete dApp with frontend, backend, wallet integration, and multiple contracts is scoped separately. You get the number before work starts, and it does not move unless the scope does.

Question 4

How long does smart contract and dApp development take?

Accepted Answer

Smart contract development and testing for a focused use case runs 4 to 8 weeks. A full dApp with frontend interface, backend services, wallet integration, and contracts runs 3 to 5 months, depending on complexity and how many chains you need to support. Audit time sits on top of that and depends on the auditor you choose.

Question 5

Can AI just write our smart contracts?

Accepted Answer

AI writes a plausible ERC-20 in seconds, and that is exactly the problem. A contract is immutable once deployed and holds real money, so a subtle reentrancy path or an access control gap is not a bug you patch next sprint. AI does not know your economic model, your regulatory constraints, or what happens to the other three contracts when this one changes. We use AI in our workflow. We do not let it decide what goes on chain.

Question 6

Do you help with audits and security reviews?

Accepted Answer

We design for auditability from the start and prepare everything an external auditor needs: documented invariants, test coverage, threat model, and deployment procedure. We also run internal reviews before handover. For high-value contracts we recommend an independent third-party audit, and we can work alongside the auditor you pick.

Question 7

Do you help with MiCA compliance for token or stablecoin projects?

Accepted Answer

We build MiCA requirements into the architecture from the start for EU-facing token issuance and stablecoin-adjacent systems: transfer restrictions, eligibility rules, disclosure hooks, and record keeping. We are not a law firm and we do not issue compliance opinions. Authorisation runs through your legal counsel. What we make sure of is that the technical architecture is ready for it instead of needing a rewrite after the legal review.

Question 8

Can you work with our legal counsel on the technical side?

Accepted Answer

Yes, and we prefer that order: legal defines the framework, we build the architecture from that document. Retrofitting lock-up periods, transfer restrictions, or investor eligibility into a deployed contract costs several times what designing for them upfront does. If you are still choosing counsel, we can tell you which technical questions they need to answer for us.

Question 9

Do you support account abstraction and smart wallets?

Accepted Answer

Yes. We implement ERC-4337 smart wallets, gasless transactions where the business sponsors fees, and social recovery flows. This matters most for products aimed at people who have never held a wallet before and will not install a browser extension or write down a seed phrase.

Question 10

Can Web3 be integrated into an existing product?

Accepted Answer

That is most of what we do. Standalone Web3 products are rarer than integrations into platforms that already have users, a backend, and a payment flow. We add wallet authentication, on-chain settlement, or token logic alongside what already works, without forcing your existing users into a new interface.

Question 11

Our contract is already deployed and something is wrong. Can you help?

Accepted Answer

Yes. We start with a technical audit of what is live: contract behaviour, upgrade paths available to you, and what can be fixed without redeployment. Sometimes a proxy upgrade solves it, sometimes a migration is the only honest answer. You get both options with the real cost of each before anyone touches anything.

Question 12

Do you build public and private Web3 solutions?

Accepted Answer

Both. Public chains when you need open verification and an existing liquidity or user ecosystem. Private or permissioned setups when participants are known, throughput matters, and data cannot sit in public. The compliance requirements in your sector usually decide this more than the technology does.

Question 13

Who owns the code, the contracts, and the keys?

Accepted Answer

You do, all three. Code is delivered to your repository. Contracts deploy from your accounts. Deployer keys and admin roles are yours from day one, and we document exactly which addresses hold which permissions. We do not retain control of anything after handover, and we do not build in a dependency that requires you to keep paying us.

Question 14

What happens after launch?

Accepted Answer

Contracts do not need maintenance the way an application does, but everything around them does: indexers, frontends, RPC providers, wallet libraries, and chain upgrades. We offer a monthly retainer covering monitoring, dependency updates, and a guaranteed response time if something breaks. It is optional, and plenty of clients take the handover and run it themselves.

Question 15

Do you sign an NDA before we share details?

Accepted Answer

Yes, always, and before you send us anything technical. We also sign mutual NDAs if you prefer. Token models and product mechanics are the part clients are most careful about, and rightly so.

Web3 & blockchain development

Web3 & Blockchain in Real Products

web platforms

mobile applications

backend services and APIs

existing enterprise systems

Built on What Actually Ships in 2026What Ships in 2026

EVM Blockchains

Account Abstraction

Smart Contracts & Token Standards

RWA & Tokenization

Web3 Infrastructure & Indexing

Oracles & External Data

Wallets & Web3 Integrations

Hybrid Architectures

Private & Permissioned Setups

What We Build with Web3 & Blockchain

Smart Contract Security: Immutable Means You Only Get One Chance

Web3 & Blockchain Integration

Built for EU Regulatory Reality, Not Just the Whitepaper

MiCA-aware by design

Web3 Project Rescue: Not All Projects Start Clean

Why Chainweb for Web3 and Blockchain

What Clients Say About Our Web3 & Blockchain Development

Questions We Get Before Every Blockchain Project

Not Sure Which Development Service Fits?

Web3 & Blockchain

Web Apps

API Development

Cybersecurity

Ready to Build Your Blockchain Product?

Request sent!